On Mac Book Air
Before you jump to the comments and blindly defend Apple, hear me out. I saw one look at it, and I'll agree that it has an intriguing design. However, when I saw the tech specs, I just couldn't believe what they're trying to sell for so much dough. To make my point, I'm going to compare it to my three year old notebook.
My regular readers will recall that my notebook is an Averatec 3250HX, purchased for less than $1000, back in 2005. I'll also agree that it was no barnstormer, and most computers are ready to be a doorstop after three years. Anyway, here goes.
The new MacBook Air has a Core 2 Duo processor standard, it's the ULV one, with a clock speed of 1.6 GHz. My Averatec shares the 1.6 GHz clock speed, but the single core of an Athlon XP 2200+ won't keep up with the C2D.
Winner: Apple
All right, my Averatec took a beating on the processsor, but there's more than just that. How about storage? Both notebooks feature an 80 gig hard drive with a 4200 spindle speed. The Mac is a 1.8" one, while my Averatec is a more standard 2.5". And don't even get me started on the optional 64 gig flash hard drive for a mere grand!
Winner: Tie
In the RAM department, the Mac with its 2 gigs clearly has my Averatec's 512 mb beat, and I'll give it to them. However, just recall that you can't upgrade the Mac.
Winner: Apple
Form Factor: Ok, the Apple clearly wins this one too with the "thin is in."
Winner: Apple
Optical Drive: Ok, the Apple doesn't have one, and my Averatec has a LiteOn DVDRW in it. Finally, a clear win for Averatec.
Winner: Averatec
In the ports department, I'm also disappointed in the Apple with only one USB port, and no audio connections except for a mic. I'll stop complaining about my three USB ports being crowded, and my on board audio.
Winner: Averatec
Speaking of audio, did Apple really expect us to buy into mono sound? That's so AM, 1970's that I've got to give it to the Averatec again.
Winner: Averatec
On the battery, the Apple claims five hours, and my Averatec new was under three hours, so I'll give it to the Apple. However, deduct some points for a battery that can't be replaced in the MacBook Air.
Winner: Apple
In the wireless networking, both have wireless built in. The MacBook Air features N, and my Averatec b/g so it must be better, right? Unfortunately, the N is really draft N, so don't count on it.
Winner: Tie
In the screen department, the Apple is 13+", and my Averatec is 12". I'll give to Apple, but it's hardly a bloodbath here either.
Winner: Apple
The conclusion is that the Apple Mac Book Pro is clearly a better product than my 3 year old notebook. However, for something costing twice as much, with three years of technology advancement built into it, I was expecting a bloodbath. However, it's not objectively. Unless you need the super slim lines, look elsewhere for a better deal. As for me, I'll hang on to my Averatec a while longer.
Jonas
Labels: Apple, Averatec, comparison, notebook
4 Comments:
you forgot to compare what some consider to be the mot important point. the weight. the AIR is designed to weigh as little as possible. how much does your three year old notebook weigh?
you said it doesn't have any audio connections except a mic. it actually has a headphone plug. unless you were referring to that 'type' of connector. it's actually called a stereo mini plug.
what about the multi touch track pad? what about built in camera for conferencing?
while I agree with the comparisons you made, i think you did leave some important elements out.
you forgot to compare what some consider to be the mot important point. the weight. the AIR is designed to weigh as little as possible. how much does your three year old notebook weigh?
you said it doesn't have any audio connections except a mic. it actually has a headphone plug. unless you were referring to that 'type' of connector. it's actually called a stereo mini plug.
what about the multi touch track pad? what about built in camera for conferencing?
while I agree with the comparisons you made, i think you did leave some important elements out.
My notebook weighs 4.3 pounds, so it's actually not that much heavier, but I'll agree that most weigh more.
My notebook has a touchpad, even if it's not multitouch, it does work. With the USB ports, I can use a webcam.
My original conclusion stands. Is $1000 really worth it to lose a pound and have a built in webcam?
to some people, yes. only time will tell how many. but a lot of apple fans were upset when they did away with the 12inch powerbook.
time will tell.
Post a Comment
<< Home